By: Camila Domonoske
Native American groups in North Dakota are scrambling to help members acquire new addresses, and new IDs, in the few weeks remaining before Election Day — the only way that some residents will be able to vote.
This week, the Supreme Court declined to overturn North Dakota’s controversial voter ID law, which requires residents to show identification with a current street address. A P.O. box does not qualify.
Many Native American reservations, however, do not use physical street addresses. Native Americans are also overrepresented in the homeless population, according to the Urban Institute. As a result, Native residents often use P.O. boxes for their mailing addresses, and may rely on tribal identification that doesn’t list an address.
Those IDs used to be accepted at polling places — including in this year’s primary election — but will not be valid for the general election. And that decision became final less than a month before Election Day, after years of confusing court battles and alterations to the requirements.
Tens of thousands of North Dakotans, including Native and non-Native residents, do not have residential addresses on their IDs and will now find it harder to vote.
They will have the option of proving their residency with “supplemental documentation,” like utility bills, instead of their IDs, but according to court records, about 18,000 North Dakotans don’t have those documents, either.
And in North Dakota, unlike other states, every resident is eligible to vote without advance voter registration — so people might not discover the problem until they show up to cast their ballot.
North Dakota Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, a Democrat, is trailing her Republican opponent in her race for re-election. Native Americans tend to vote for Democrats.
The Republican-controlled state government says the voter ID requirement is necessary to connect voters with the correct ballot, and to prevent non-North Dakotans from signing up for North Dakota P.O. boxes and traveling to the state to vote fraudulently. In 2016, a judge overturning the law noted that voter fraud in North Dakota is “virtually non-existent.”
The state government says that residents without a street ID should contact their county’s 911 coordinator, to sign up for a free street address and request a letter confirming that address.
A group called Native Vote ND has been sharing those official instructions on Facebook.
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe is telling members to get in touch if they need help obtaining a residential address and updating their tribal ID. The tribe also says it will be sending drivers to take voters to the polls on Election Day.
“Native Americans can live on the reservations without an address. They’re living in accordance with the law and treaties, but now all of a sudden they can’t vote,” Standing Rock chairman Mike Faith said in a statement. “Our voices should be heard and they should be heard fairly at the polls just like all other Americans.”
Meanwhile, the Bismarck Tribune reports that a Native American organization is working to come up with a last-minute solution for voters who would otherwise be turned away:
“Bret Healy, a consultant for Four Directions, which is led by members of South Dakota’s Rosebud Sioux Tribe, said the organization believes it has a common-sense solution.
“The group is working with tribal leaders in North Dakota to have a tribal government official available at every polling place on reservations to issue a tribal voting letter that includes the eligible voter’s name, date of birth and residential address.”
A state official told tribal leaders that such letters will be accepted as proof of residency, the Tribune reports.
Heitkamp called the ID law “burdensome” and once again called for a law to protect the voting rights of Native Americans. She and other legislators have introduced such a bill year after year, unsuccessfully.
“Given the number of Native Americans who have served, fought, and died for this country, it is appalling that some people would still try and erect barriers to suppress their ability to vote,” Heitkamp said in a statement. “Native Americans served in the military before they were even allowed to vote, and they continue to serve at the highest rate of any population in this country.”
The ACLU said the Supreme Court’s decision “enables mass disenfranchisement.” “In an election that may wind up being decided by just a few thousand votes, the court’s decision could be deeply consequential for the country, not just those who live in North Dakota,” staff reporter Ashoka Mukpo wrote on Friday.
In 2016, the Harvard Law Review found that Native Americans “routinely face hurdles in exercising the right to vote and securing representation,” and that the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was only a partial solution to the problem.
Y continuamos con los “hitos” mas vergonzosos de la television basura peruana. El día de hoy presentamos a un energúmeno llamado Phillip Butters, “paraperiodista”, pseudo comunicador, y acaparador de diálogo quien (para lograr el apoyo de la masa irritable, emotiva y que generalmente no analiza en profundidad por falta de educación o tiempo) al mas fiel estilo de los agitadores utiliza sus espacios para soltar los mas chabacanos, escatológicos y provocadores comentarios en la antena pública demostrando un “conocimiento de calle” sobre muchos temas de actualidad.
Segun Butters, él es el mejor de todos, el mas importante, el que conoce a todos, quien corta el bacalao, y que sin su existencia el Perú y el mundo estarían perdidos. Lo cierto es que utiliza recursos que apelan al narcisismo y la megalomanía (A.K.A. “autobombo”) para adelantarse y atarantar a sus interlocutores al momento del debate. “Yo se que tu eres inteligente y me vas a dar la razón”, “Si conocieras a mis clientes, te sorprenderías”, “Nadie en su sano juicio diría lo contrario..habria que ser idiota para hacerlo”, “a mi me llueven ofertas de trabajo por mi capacidad”, “Yo soy un experto”, “Yo lo se porque lo he vivido”, etc. Ver: Analizan argumentos de Phillip Butters y cómo “acapara el diálogo”
Su conveniente “posición” conservadora junto al movimiento “Con Mis Hijos no te Metas” lo ha puesto en el ojo público como un completo machista, homofóbico, agresivo, sexista, brusco, patán y bully. A ello habría que agregarle su racismo escondido el cual se dio a conocer debido a sus desafortunadas afirmaciones sobre los ecuatorianos en las ultimas clasificatorias al mundial de fútbol de Rusia 2018.
Video: Hincha Amarillo
Actualmente sus incendiarias declaraciones se han apaciguado dado el involucramiento de su amigo Antonio Camayo de IZA Motors en el escándalo de “los cuellos blancos”.
Que estos posts sirvan pues para dar cuenta del gran problema del Perú y que quede registro de todo aquello que no debería ser aceptado en la sociedad peruana.