this artist tattoos and beheads china figurines to take on art history’s gender bias

Jessica Harrison’s reworked ceramic heroines prove women are not ornaments.

British artist Jessica Harrison tackles and unpacks assumptions about the female body with her cleverly embellished figurines. The found ceramics are selected for their silly poses, onto which Harrison adds her own flourishes: an anatomical overhaul spiked with tongue-in-cheek humor. As Harrison puts it, “the re-worked ceramic makes the figure a participant in their own undoing.”

Deploying a wide variety of materials in her artistic practice, from paint to textiles to digital collage, she regularly explores the intricacies of the sensory body. She’s made silk scarves with muscle patterns and roughly articulated clay pin-ups. Examples of Harrison’s work are currently on view in the group show Ceramix, at La Maison Rouge in Paris, which explores experimental ceramics by a range of artists from throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. We caught up with the artist to discuss feminism, creativity, and undercutting art history’s gender bias.

Your pieces in the Ceramix exhibition are shown under the sub-heading “Sacred and Profane: Revisited Traditions.” How does that title relate to your work?
I guess my work in the exhibition slots in quite well with that summary, given that I’m appropriating or re-thinking ornamental items that were acquired with the intention of showing off a particular taste within the home. Simplistically, you could say that traditional pieces are trying to appeal to some kind of “good taste” middle-class Englishness. They kind of have this weird pointlessness to them — their poses, their expressions — the figures are just in some kind of bizarre moment of blissful, bland nothingness. With the Broken figures, I am trying to activate their poses, give them some meaning; and in Painted Ladies, the crudeness of the tattoo designs highlights the ridiculous outfits these poor ladies are forever subjected to.

What prompted the Broken series of decapitated, scalped, and otherwise “injured” ladies?
I had an interest in working with the figure, but I didn’t want to make something figurative — I was trying to move away from overly defined outlines of the body. The series was a playful, cathartic way to try to re-work the figure. With these pieces, I reference that kind of anatomical enlightenment era, when the body was being explored from the skin down to the bone, and everything in-between. However advanced our explorations of the body have become since, this interior anatomical space is still gender-biased — a classically and continually male space. The female body is only typically used when illustrating a specifically “female part” of the body: the reproductive organs. The female interior space is still laced with taboo in a way that the male interior is not. I know this is still the case because I’ve received criticism for reworking female figurines — that it is somehow more “violent” than reworking male figurines.

You don’t consider the pieces violent?
I don’t. Each figurine has been carefully chosen based on their existing pose, where the re-worked ceramic makes the figure a participant in their own undoing. I like to think that these passive ladies have been given a more active role, more in line with how the male body is depicted, in both anatomical history and art history. I do consider them to be quite humorous though, and this is usually the reaction that they get, from children right up to older audiences (who more typically might have owned these kind of figurines originally).

Do you see these two series as feminist? What role does feminism play in your work?
I am a feminist and feminist issues are important in my life, work, ideas, and how I go about my everyday business. Having said that, I don’t consider “feminism” to play an active or overt role in my work, but the continuing issues facing women and young girls today is of course something that is always going to be threaded into my work when dealing with figurative pieces or the subject of the body.

Can you talk about your use of “found ceramics”? How does that influence your practice?
I started working with found ceramics because I didn’t know how to make ceramics from scratch — I decided to work backwards and get to know clay back to front. The Broken and Painted Ladies series, made using mass-produced figurines, could in theory continue forever. A part of me would like to keep going, to re-work all of the figurines that exist in the world, but there are too many other projects out there for me to be working on.

‘Ceramix’ is on view at La Maison Rouge and Cité de la Céramique in Paris through June 5, 2016.
jessicaharrison.co.uk

CreditsText Sarah Moroz
Images courtesy Jessica Harrison

Lescano: “Una generación sin porno se va a dedicar más al deporte y al estudio”

El congresista de Acción Popular explicó a RPP Web todo sobre el proyecto de Ley para suspender el contenido pornográfico en internet.

De aprobarse este Proyecto de Ley solo forjará futuros expertos en ingeniería de sistemas, hackers y crackers improvisados en el Perú.

De aprobarse este Proyecto de Ley solo forjará futuros expertos en ingeniería de sistemas, hackers y crackers improvisados en el Perú.

Del Congreso de la República depende el destino de las páginas pornográficas en el Perú. El proyecto de Ley que presentó el legislador Yonhy Lescano (Acción Popular) busca limitar el contenido para adultos en las páginas para que ni chicos ni adultos puedan tener acceso a él

Aunque todavía no ha pasado a las comisiones congresales para que sea evaluado y votado, la iniciativa ya ha generado reacciones diversas en Facebook y Twitter. Que es decisión de cada uno, que corta las libertades. Los argumentos en contra son diversos. Lescano conversó con RPP Web sobre su proyecto y explicó el motivo que lo llevó a presentarlo.

“Una generación sin pornografía se va a dedicar más al deporte y al estudio. La pornografía produce adicción y distorsiona la conducta sexual de las personas, están estimulados (por lo que ven) y así van a violar a niños o mujeres”, dijo el legislador.

Los antecedentes. Tomó como ejemplo los casos de Corea del Sur y el Reino Unido. En el primer país, la restricción a este tipo de páginas es total, incluso Lescano comentó que en una visita pudo comprobar que esto se cumple estrictamente. Intentó ingresar a una de estas páginas y no tuvo éxito. “El sistema funciona muy bien allá”, dice.

En el segundo país las restricciones son parciales. Sin embargo el Congreso ha cerrado cada vez más el cerco a la industria en tema de contenidos y de inscripciones. Estos son los principales ejemplos del acciopopulista para crear el proyecto en el Perú.

“En otros países pasa, donde se ha impulsado la educación hay un mejor nivel educativo. Se ha prohibído estas páginas para evitar delitos sexuales y se ha conseguido, en Corea del Sur por ejemplo. Pensamos que esto es importante para evitar delitos sexuales”, dice.

Presentó el proyecto que creó con el apoyo de sus colegas de bancada que están de acuerdo con la medida. Sobre las voces críticas que aluden a una distorsión en las libertades, el legislador responde tajantemente: “La libertad debemos canalizarla adecuadamente. (El porno) La distorsiona, tiene más efectos negativos. ¿Qué cosa que tenga que ver con el interés público tiene la pornografía?, ¿Qué libertad se corta?, absolutamente nada”, comenta con voz enérgica.

¿Recorte de libertades?

No hay comparación entre la internet y el contenido televisivo, al menos en este caso para Lescano. “La pornografía es pornografía, no se puede comparar con los contenidos televisivos. En otros países los chicos tienen primer nivel porque no los envenenan con estos contenidos. Somos muy permisivos en aras de la llamada libertad, yo creo que es una distorsión de la libertad”.

Ahora la pelota rodará en el campo de las comisiones de Educación y Transporte, donde será probablemente discutido este proyecto, informó a RPP Web el congresista. Si es aprobado, irá al Pleno donde deberá ser refrendado por la mayoría. Entonces la realidad de un país sin pornografía sería realidad.

El siguiente paso sería ordenar a las empresas de comunicaciones a que bloqueen los contenidos. Y luego, la reglamentación para que los infractores cumplan una pena y para que no se le saque la vuelta a la ley. “Las empresas tienen que cumplir las medidas. Veo como padre y político que esto (el contenido porno) no nos trae nada bueno, hay que preguntarle a los papás y las mamás si están de acuerdo”, aseguró.

El congresista sabe que se acercan días de intenso debate, el mismo que ya empezó en las redes y que continuará por varios días más.

En: rpp

Proyecto de Ley aquí: PL-00825-2016-1221

Proyecto de Ley en página del Congreso de la República del Perú

South Carolina lawmakers propose pornography block on new computers

State Rep. Bill Chumley, R-Spartanburg, said the Human Trafficking Prevention Act would require manufacturers or sellers to install digital blocking capabilities on computers and other devices that access the internet to prevent the viewing of obscene content.

Representative William M. "Bill" Chumley. In: www.scstatehouse.gov

Bill sponsor: Representative William M. “Bill” Chumley. In: www.scstatehouse.gov

By Brendan O’Brien

Computers and devices sold in South Carolina that can access the internet would be required to have filters installed to prevent people from viewing pornography, although buyers could pay a $20 fee to remove the blocking software under a proposal before the legislature.

The amendment would require manufacturers or sellers of computers and internet-accessible devices to install software that blocks pornography, according to a draft of the amendment filed with the South Carolina General Assembly on Dec. 15.

One of its sponsors said on Tuesday the amendment would help raise money for the state’s task force to combat human trafficking, adding that the measure would not restrict their legal liberties, indicating it would allow for viewing adult pornography.

“This is a way to preserve freedom, not raise taxes and combat a serious problem all in one,” State Representative William “Bill” Chumley, a Republican, said in an interview.

Buyers over 18 in South Carolina would have to pay a $20 fee to have the block removed. Manufacturers or sellers would pay a $20 opt-out fee for each computer or device sold so they didn’t have to install the blocking software, according to the proposed measure.

The amendment did not address any technology challenges or whether the filter would be a barrier to interstate commerce for technology firms that sell their devices nationwide.

There was no timetable for debate and a possible vote. Chumley has told local media that he sees the amendment as a starting point for debate and that the proposal he co-sponsored may be adjusted.

The amendment corresponds with the Republican Party’s national platform that calls for states to get tough on pornography, adding that the internet has become a safe haven for predators.

“Pornography, with its harmful effects, especially on children, has become a public health crisis that is destroying the lives of millions,” the GOP said in its platform. “We urge energetic prosecution of child pornography, which is closely linked to human trafficking.”

In April, a Republican-backed resolution in Utah declared pornography a public health hazard and an epidemic that normalizes violence against women and children and makes men less likely to want to get married.

(Reporting by Brendan O’Brien in Milwaukee; Additional reporting by Jon Herskovitz in Austin, Texas; Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe)

In: reuters 

See: South Carolina statehouse profile – Representative William M. “Bill” Chumley 

1 5 6 7 8